|
Safe Cell Tab
Radiation protection
for cell phone users
go to page bottom for special offer

Articles Index for cell phone radiation reports
What can I use to protect myself from cell phone radiation
How cell phone radiation and electromagnetic radiation works

|
|
Cell Phone Radiation
In a recent scientific study conducted by a team of researchers from the
Technion, a possible link between microwave radiation, similar to the type found
in cell phones, and different kinds of damage to the visual system was
found. At least one kind of damage seems to accumulate over time and not heal,
challenging the common view and leading the researchers to the assertion that
the duration of exposure is not less important than the intensity of the
irradiation. The researchers also emphasized that existing exposure guidelines
for microwave radiation might have to change.

Photo at right shows microscope photographs of lenses
incubated in organ culture conditions for 12 days. Right frame shows Control
lens with no damage. Bottom frame demonstrates the effect of microwave radiation
on bovine lens sutures for a total exposure of 192 cycles (1.1GHz, 2.22mW).Each
cycle lasts 50min followed by 10 min pause. In the absence of microwave
radiation, the bubbles are generated by temperature increase to 39.5 8C during 4
h. The effects of exposure to electromagnetic radiation have long been a subject
for debate among scientists. The technological developments of the last twenty
years such as cell and cordless phones, wireless communications, monitors and
even high voltage lines have all been studied as potential risk factors for
cancer and other diseases. Less known to the public, but still a matter of some
extensive research, is the study of the effect of microwave radiation on the
visual system and especially on the lens of the eye. The basic motivation for
this research came after World War II when it was suspected that radar operators
suffered a greater risk of developing cataracts (a condition characterized by
clouding in the natural lens of the eye). Although these particular suspicions
were eventually shown to be debatable, they were the trigger for the first
guidelines for exposure to electromagnetic radiation. Moreover, the eye as our
natural radiation detector is the obvious choice for investigating the effects
of electromagnetic radiation upon the human body.
In more recent studies on animals the effects of microwave radiation as a risk
factor for cataracts have been established and have helped determine the
guidelines put forth by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation
Protection (ICNIRP) in 1998. A common measure for microwave radiation is the
Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) which is the average power density absorbed in a
given volume per average weight density (Watt/Kg). This is the standard used by
cell phone companies, among others, to measure levels of radiation. When
microwave energy impinges upon body tissue, part of it is absorbed and converted
to heat due to ionic conduction. This heat manifests itself as a temperature
increase inside the tissue. Past studies in animals have shown that even a
slight increase in temperature close to the lens (as low as 3 degrees Celsius)
can increase the risk of developing a cataract. With a low enough SAR the local
temperature in the lens might never increase to that level. A less common
measure is called Specific Energy Absorption (SA), and is defined as the energy
density absorbed in the tissue divided by its weight density. While SAR is the
measure of the rate microwave radiation is absorbed by a tissue, SA is the
measure of the total energy absorbed. This difference played a significant role
in a recently published study on the effects of microwave radiation on the
visual system.
In the study conducted by researchers in the Rappaport Faculty of Medicine at
the Technion, and published in the journal Bioelectromagnetics, a new link has
been found between microwave radiation and the development of cataracts. Eye
lenses of one-year-old male calves obtained from a slaughterhouse were exposed
to microwave radiation - one eye from each pair used for control. Each exposure
session lasted about two weeks. Both control and exposed lens were kept in an
incubator at a constant temperature. During this period each exposed lens had
experienced up to 2mW of 1.1GHz radiation virtually around the clock, and each
hour it was exposed for a 50 minute session followed by a 10 minute break.
During one of these breaks, every 24 hours, it was tested optically and compared
to the control lens. During the short (5 minutes) optical test, the lens was not
exposed to radiation, but when exposed, its average temperature was maintained
constant in an incubator
The experiment yielded a number of interesting results:
1. Exposing the lens for a prolonged time to microwave radiation (in the
frequency and intensity described above) caused macroscopic damage affecting the
optical quality of the lens. This damage increased as the experiment and
irradiation continued and reached a maximum level after a number of days. When
the exposure stopped the optical damage began to heal gradually. Interestingly
enough, a similar maximum level was observed when the irradiation intensity was
reduced to one-half the original, except that it took twice the time.
2. On the microscopic level a different kind of damage occurred. Tiny "bubbles"
were created on the surface of the lens. The bubbles were formed by irradiation
with microwave and were not the result of a heat created throughout the lens.
The researchers have speculated that the mechanism responsible for the creation
of the bubbles is microscopic friction between particular cells exposed to
electromagnetic radiation. Contrary to the macroscopic damage, the microscopic
damage did not show any signs of healing and continued to accumulate during the
course of the experiment.
Professor Levi Schächter
Although the researchers are cautious about interpreting the results of the
experiment and its possible implications to public health, it seems that
prolonged exposure to microwave radiation similar to that used by cellular
phones can lead to both macroscopic and microscopic damage to the lens and that
at least part of this damage seems to accumulate over time and does not seem to
heal. Professor Levi Schchter, who worked on the research, told IsraCast that
attention should be paid not only to the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) but also
to the total energy absorbed by the tissue (SA), which is not currently under
supervision by the appropriate regulative authorities. Implying that the
duration of exposure is not less important than the intensity of the
irradiation. |
|
|
| |
|
To learn more inquire these other search
topics: cell phone danger, cell phone cancer, cell phone radiation
shield, electromagnetic field, EMF effects, brain cancer and cell phone, cell phone electromagnetic
radiation |
|
|